Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal could be dismissed for non-deposit of the penalty without first deciding the prayer for dispensing with pre-deposit, and whether the matter required remand for fresh disposal on merits.
Analysis: The pre-deposit requirement under Section 129 of the Customs Act, 1962 included a discretion in the appellate authority to dispense with deposit where undue hardship was shown. A request for waiver had been made, but the appellate authority did not decide that request and instead dismissed the appeal for want of deposit. Since the deposit had subsequently been made, the proper course was to restore the matter for consideration on merits after notice to the appellant.
Conclusion: The dismissal order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh disposal on merits.