Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the turnover in question was liable to tax as a first sale in the State or was exempt as a second sale on which tax had already been paid, and whether the assessee was entitled to have the foundational fact of the first sale properly verified before liability was fastened.
Analysis: The assessee had produced declarations and bills indicating that the goods had already suffered tax in the hands of the first seller. The revisional authority and the Tribunal proceeded on an assumption that the purchases were made at Chandigarh and treated the transactions as taxable first purchases in Punjab, without first verifying the correctness of the assessee's plea that the first sale had already taken place in favour of M/s. Kamakhya, Zirakpur. Where the claim was that the goods had already been taxed at the first stage, the assessing and revisional authorities were required to examine that issue on the material placed before them. If the first sale had been taxed, proof of movement of goods by the assessee would not be determinative of liability in the manner assumed by the authorities below.
Conclusion: The tax demand could not be sustained on the basis of the findings recorded by the revisional authority and the Tribunal, and the matter had to be reconsidered after proper verification of the first-sale issue.