Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order and consequential demand were liable to be quashed for non-service of the proposition notice and breach of natural justice, and whether writ jurisdiction could be exercised despite availability of an appellate remedy.
Analysis: The proposition notice was required to be served in the manner prescribed by the Rules before an assessment could be completed. The record did not establish valid service on the petitioner or show that the person who received the notice was an authorised agent. Since the petitioner was not afforded a proper opportunity to respond, the assessment was made without compliance with the mandatory procedure and offended the principles of natural justice. The availability of an alternate appeal did not bar interference because the impugned action itself suffered from a fundamental procedural defect.
Conclusion: The assessment order and the consequential demand and recovery notice were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after valid service of notice and opportunity to file objections.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed on the ground of invalid service of notice and violation of natural justice, with the assessment reopened for reconsideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where service of the pre-assessment notice prescribed by the governing rules is a condition precedent to assessment, failure to effect valid service and denial of opportunity to object render the assessment unsustainable, and the existence of an alternate remedy does not preclude writ relief in such a case.