Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether projector heads, sound heads and arc lamps cleared together were classifiable as a complete cinematograph projector under Item 37B(a) of the Central Excise Tariff or as parts of a cinematograph projector under Item 37B(b).
Analysis: The governing explanation to Item 37B showed that classification under the entry for cinematograph projectors depended on clearance of a complete projector, whether assembled or unassembled. A complete projector comprised several essential components, and the three items cleared together did not by themselves constitute a complete cinematograph projector. Their mere combination also did not make them capable of functioning as a projector, while the remaining items were necessary for operation and were not mere accessories. The notifications relied upon did not alter this classification position.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable as parts of a cinematograph projector under Item 37B(b), not as a complete cinematograph projector under Item 37B(a), and the assessee's revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods cleared together do not constitute a complete and functional article, they are classifiable according to their real character as parts rather than as the finished goods.