Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to assessment of belt conveyors on the basis of invoice price under Notification No. 120/75 dated 30-4-1975, and whether proviso (iv) was inapplicable because the sale prices were not influenced by any commercial, financial or other relationship between the manufacturer and the buyers.
Analysis: The proviso excludes the benefit of the notification only where the invoice price is influenced by a commercial, financial or other relationship of the kind specified therein. Mere execution of contracts fixing the sale price does not by itself show absence of arm's length dealing. On the facts, there was nothing to indicate that the contracts between the applicants and the purchasers were influenced by any disqualifying relationship. The transactions were therefore treated as arm's length and the condition in proviso (iv) was held satisfied.
Conclusion: The applicants were entitled to the benefit of assessment on the basis of invoice price under Notification No. 120/75 dated 30-4-1975.
Final Conclusion: The revision application succeeded, and the duty assessment was held to be deductible on invoice price basis.
Ratio Decidendi: Where invoice price is not shown to be influenced by any commercial, financial or other disqualifying relationship, the benefit of the excise valuation notification cannot be denied merely because the sale price was fixed under a contract.