Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption notifications covering woollen goods required, for each batch, that the minimum shoddy content obtained by garnetting or pulling should be not less than 50 per cent, the virgin wool content should not exceed 5 per cent, the soft wool content should not exceed 15 per cent, and the total wool content should meet the prescribed minimum, so as to qualify for exemption.
Analysis: The governing notifications were read as laying down separate and cumulative conditions for exemption. The expression "shoddy" was construed to mean wool obtained by garnetting or pulling of rags, tailor cuttings and hard wastes, and soft waste was held not to answer that description. The trade notices were treated as supporting the view that soft wool waste beyond the stated limit could not be permitted. On that construction, the benefit of the exemption was available only where each prescribed condition was independently satisfied for the batch in question.
Conclusion: The exemption was available only if all the stipulated conditions were separately complied with; the goods were not entitled to the benefit merely because some other fibre was used or absent.
Final Conclusion: The prior appellate order was set aside and the matter was sent back for verification of records and fresh assessment in accordance with the declared interpretation.