TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Errors in Additional Commissioner's Decision on Karnataka Sales Tax Act; Appeal Allowed, Orders Set Aside</h1> <h3>Jayanth and Co. Versus State of Karnataka</h3> The court found errors in the Additional Commissioner's decisions regarding the validity of the exercise of powers under section 22A of the Karnataka ... - Issues:1. Validity of the exercise of powers under section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act for the period ending March 31, 2002.2. Sustainability of the revisional order dated December 24, 2008 under section 22A(1) of the Act.Issue 1: Validity of the exercise of powers under section 22A for the period ending March 31, 2002:The appellant, a dealer in manufacturing mosaic tiles, had their assessment concluded for the year 2001-02 based on a return filed on March 30, 2005. Subsequently, an inspection by the intelligence wing on February 15, 2005 led to the reopening of the assessment under section 12A of the Act. A penalty was imposed under section 12A(1A) of the Act. An appeal was filed and partially allowed by the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals). However, the Additional Commissioner, deeming the appellate order prejudicial to revenue, set aside the Joint Commissioner's decision and reinstated the original authority's order. The court found that the original authority's assessment was a best judgment assessment without proper consideration of the appellant's case. The Additional Commissioner erred in not remanding the matter to the assessing officer for proper consideration. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside and modifying the Additional Commissioner's order.Issue 2: Sustainability of the revisional order dated December 24, 2008 under section 22A(1) of the Act:The court held that the Additional Commissioner's decision to set aside the Joint Commissioner's order and reinstate the original authority's decision was erroneous. The Additional Commissioner should have remanded the matter to the assessing officer for proper consideration, especially since the appellant's case had not been adequately evaluated. As a result of this error, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside and modifying the Additional Commissioner's order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for a fresh consideration, with instructions to hear the appellant and dispose of the case in accordance with the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
