Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee collected sales tax on the subsidy component and thereby attracted forfeiture under section 18AA of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The invoice showed that the tax components were computed on the gross amount before deducting the subsidy, while the subsidy was merely reduced from the sale price to arrive at the net invoice value. On that basis, the amount collected from the buyers included tax attributable to the subsidy component. The amount so collected was not due as tax and could not be retained by the assessee. Under section 18AA(4), such excess amount was liable to be forfeited and recovery by the State discharged the dealer from any corresponding refund liability.
Conclusion: The assessee had collected tax on the subsidy component and the forfeiture order was justified, in favour of Revenue.