Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subsidy paid by the Central Government to fertilizer manufacturers forms part of the "turnover" under section 2(i) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 and is therefore liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The expression "turnover" was construed in the context of the statutory definition of sale and the nature of the transaction between seller and purchaser. The Court held that a sale is a bilateral transaction in which the price is the amount agreed between the parties and paid by the purchaser. The subsidy paid by the Government of India was not part of the price paid by the purchaser and was granted to keep fertilizer prices at a reasonable level and ensure a reasonable return to manufacturers. The Court rejected the contention that the words "aggregate amount" in the U.P. Act altered this position, holding that they conveyed the same sense as the relevant expression considered in earlier decisions.
Conclusion: The subsidy granted by the Government of India does not form part of turnover under section 2(i) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, and cannot be subjected to sales tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Subsidy paid by the Government to a manufacturer, not being consideration received from the purchaser for the sale, does not constitute part of turnover under the sales tax law.