Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT and Sales Tax

        2010 (2) TMI 1107 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court upholds 12% tax on vacuum cleaner, dismisses writ petition. The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal's decision to tax the vacuum cleaner at 12% for the periods in question. The court found no ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court upholds 12% tax on vacuum cleaner, dismisses writ petition.

                            The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal's decision to tax the vacuum cleaner at 12% for the periods in question. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments regarding the prospective nature of the notification or the consistency of previous assessments. The principles of law and judgments cited by the petitioner were deemed inapplicable to the case at hand. The court did not award costs.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Quashing of notice under section 27 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981.
                            2. Quashing of the Commercial Taxes Tribunal's order dated April 15, 2004.
                            3. Direction to dispose of the petitioner's review and reference petitions pending before the Tribunal.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Quashing of Notice under Section 27 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981
                            The petitioner, a public limited company engaged in the marketing, distribution, and sales of vacuum cleaners, sought to quash the notice under section 27 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, for recovery of sales tax during the pendency of a review petition before the Commercial Taxes Tribunal. The petitioner argued that the assessment should be at the rate of 8% as opposed to 12%, as the vacuum cleaner should not be classified as "electrical goods" under entry No. 81 of the Sales Tax Notification No. 1026/77-14541, dated December 26, 1977. The State Government later issued Notification No. S.O. 134 on July 27, 2000, specifying "vacuum cleaner" to be taxed at 12%, effective from the date of publication.

                            Issue 2: Quashing of the Commercial Taxes Tribunal's Order Dated April 15, 2004
                            The petitioner challenged the Tribunal's order which upheld the assessment at 12%. The petitioner contended that the notification dated July 27, 2000, is prospective and should not apply to the periods in question (1990-91 to 1993-94). The Additional Advocate-General agreed that the notification was prospective. The petitioner further argued that the authorities had consistently taxed the product at 8% in previous years, citing the principle of consistency in tax assessments and referring to the case of Eureka Forbes Ltd. v. State of Bihar, where the Ranchi Bench had set aside a similar assessment at 12%.

                            Issue 3: Direction to Dispose of Pending Review and Reference Petitions
                            The petitioner sought a direction for the Tribunal to dispose of the pending review and reference petitions, arguing that the writ petition was maintainable despite the pending review application and reference case. The court noted that section 47 of the Act provides for review on account of apparent mistakes and that the review jurisdiction is limited. The court decided to proceed with the hearing, emphasizing that the primary relief sought was to set aside the Tribunal's order.

                            Court's Findings:
                            1. Maintainability of the Writ Petition: The court rejected the respondents' contention that the writ petition was not maintainable, noting that the dominant relief sought was to set aside the Tribunal's order and that pure questions of law were raised.

                            2. Assessment Rate: The court examined sections 11 and 12 of the Act and concluded that the vacuum cleaner falls under entry 81 of the notification under section 12, which prescribes a tax rate of 12%. The court found no competing entry that could apply, thus affirming the Tribunal's assessment.

                            3. Previous Judgment (Eureka Forbes Ltd. v. State of Bihar): The court distinguished the present case from the earlier judgment, which dealt with the reopening of assessment based on an audit report, not the classification of the product under tax entries.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal's decision to tax the vacuum cleaner at 12% for the periods in question. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments regarding the prospective nature of the notification or the consistency of previous assessments. The principles of law and judgments cited by the petitioner were deemed inapplicable to the case at hand. The court did not award costs.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found