Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the authority determining refund under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could ignore the appellate order and go behind it while quantifying the refund.
Analysis: The refund authority was required to act within the limited scope of determining the amount refundable and had to respect the appellate order already passed in favour of the assessee. The power to quantify refund did not include any authority to re-examine the merits of the liability or to exercise review, appeal, or revisional jurisdiction over the concluded appellate decision. The earlier view that refund proceedings are confined to quantification and cannot reopen the assessment position governed the matter.
Conclusion: The refund authority could not disregard the appellate order, and the impugned order rejecting refund was unsustainable.