Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 13A(4) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was justified on the footing that the goods were being transported without supporting documents and were not shown in the books of account.
Analysis: The goods intercepted in transit were found accompanied only by documents that did not satisfactorily correspond to the load in the tanker. No bill for the entire quantity found at the time of inspection was produced at the spot, and the explanation that part of the consignment had been transferred from another tanker was not supported by contemporaneous material. The statements of the driver and khalasi also did not establish that the goods in the intercepted tanker were covered by the documents produced. The quantity found was not shown in the applicant's books of account.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 13A(4) was validly imposed and the revision was liable to fail.
Final Conclusion: The finding that the intercepted goods were transported without reliable documentary support and without corresponding book entries was affirmed, leaving no infirmity in the penalty order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods found in transit are not supported by contemporaneous, corresponding documents and are not reflected in the books of account, penalty for unauthorised transport is sustainable.