Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a claim for exemption from sales tax, not raised in the returns, replies, or at any time before completion of assessment, could be introduced for the first time in rectification proceedings under section 43 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act as an error apparent on the face of the record.
Analysis: Rectification under section 43 is confined to mistakes apparent on the face of the record. A claim for exemption that was never made before completion of assessment does not form part of the assessment record. The exemption in question was conditional and required supporting documents and proof of satisfaction of the notification conditions. Since neither the claim nor the supporting materials were placed before the assessing authority at the assessment stage, the completed assessments could not be treated as mistaken on that ground. After assessment, the authority becomes functus officio except to the extent permitted by statute, and a fresh exemption claim cannot be introduced through rectification.
Conclusion: The claim for exemption could not be entertained in rectification proceedings, and the rejection of the rectification application was correct.