Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the taxing authority was bound to entertain the petitioner's application for rectification where freight charges charged independently in the invoices were claimed to be exempt from inclusion in the assessable turnover under rule 6(c) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules.
Analysis: The exemption for freight charged independently was recognised as a substantive relief available in law, and the mere fact that it had not been claimed at the original assessment stage did not justify refusal to consider rectification. The authority could not decline to examine whether an item not liable to tax had been included in the assessment merely because the record did not then contain the claim. If the turnover was shown to consist of exempt freight charges, maintaining the assessment would perpetuate an illegality. Taxing authorities were therefore required to adopt an equitable and justice-oriented approach in procedural matters and consider the rectification request on its merits.
Conclusion: The application for rectification was required to be entertained and decided in accordance with law, with liberty to the petitioner to adduce acceptable evidence in support of the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: A rectification application should not be rejected merely because an exempt item was not claimed at the original assessment stage, if the mistake is capable of correction and the assessment may otherwise include turnover not liable to tax.