Rubber goods classification turns on specific entry coverage and actual delivery to Indian Railways, not mere railway use.

Goods manufactured out of rubber were held not to qualify as engineering goods or railway equipment merely because they were made to specification or could be used in railway operations; Entry 198 applies only to the specific items listed, and a mere possible use with railway goods is insufficient. Entry 146(xxix) was also inapplicable because the goods were not shown to be meant for plant or machinery covered by that entry. The matter was remanded for limited enquiry into whether the goods were actually delivered to the Indian Railways; if delivery is established, the sales are taxable at 8 per cent, otherwise the goods fall under the specific rubber goods entry.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disputed goods manufactured out of rubber were classifiable as engineering goods/railway equipment under Entry 198 of Schedule IV to the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994, or were taxable as rubber goods under Entry 242 of the same Schedule.

Analysis: The expression "engineering goods, that is to say" in Entry 198 confines the entry to the specific items enumerated therein, and not to every product that may involve engineering skill. Goods claimed to be spare parts, accessories or components must be relatable to the items specifically listed in Entry 198(i) to (xxxiv); a mere possibility of use with railway goods is insufficient. Entry 146(xxix) was also held inapplicable because the items were not shown to be meant for plant or machinery covered by that entry. At the same time, Entry 242 is a specific entry for rubber goods and applies where the goods cannot be brought within any other specific entry. The crucial factual question was whether the goods, though sold first to the pro forma respondent, were in fact delivered to the Indian Railways.

Conclusion: The earlier orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for limited enquiry into actual delivery to the Indian Railways. If such delivery is established, the sales to the pro forma respondent are to be taxed at 8 per cent; otherwise the goods would fall under the rubber goods entry.

Ratio Decidendi: A product is not classifiable as engineering goods merely because it is manufactured to specification or may be used in railway operations; it must be shown to fall within the specific entry, and where that linkage fails the specific rubber goods entry applies.

---