Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inward freight formed part of turnover where the dealer claimed to act as an agent of the brick-kiln owners and asserted that freight was separately charged.
Analysis: The definition of turnover under section 2(i) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was treated as in pari materia with the definition of sale price under section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act. On that basis, freight can be excluded only where the transaction is not on a principal-to-principal basis and the factual foundation for exclusion is established. The record disclosed no evidence of agency, no privity of contract with the brick-kiln owners, and no finding by the Tribunal on who placed the purchase orders or took delivery. The earlier finding of the assessing authority that the dealer acted on its own account was not properly displaced. At the same time, exclusion of freight also required a clear finding that it was separately charged in the bills, which had not been examined by the appellate authorities.
Conclusion: In the absence of proof of agency, inward freight would ordinarily form part of turnover; however, because the material question whether freight was separately charged was not conclusively determined, the matter required fresh consideration by the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi: Freight is excluded from turnover only when the statutory conditions for exclusion are affirmatively established, and a dealer claiming agency must prove a principal-agent relationship and the factual basis for separate freight charges.