Review jurisdiction and form 25A requirements: first sellers may rely on sale bills when the statutory purpose is otherwise met.

Rule 32(13C) permits review where the Tribunal's earlier order is plainly inconsistent with the governing rule, because review may correct a patent error and align the order with the correct legal position. The provision governing form 25A applies only in the context of intermediary dealers who are neither the first nor the last seller; a dealer who is the first seller of Fifth Schedule goods sold to registered dealers is not required to furnish the form when sale bills already disclose the relevant particulars. The statutory purpose is treated as satisfied by the sale bills, so insistence on form 25A is unnecessary.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in exercising review jurisdiction to correct its earlier order and allow the assessee's claim; (ii) Whether form 25A was required to be furnished by a dealer who was admittedly the first seller of goods taxable under the Fifth Schedule when sales were made to registered dealers in the State.

Issue (i): Whether the Tribunal was justified in exercising review jurisdiction to correct its earlier order and allow the assessee's claim.

Analysis: The earlier order of the Tribunal was found to be contrary to the express language of rule 32(13C). The later view taken by the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for a subsequent year was consistent with the rule, and the review was used to align the earlier decision with the correct legal position. A review that corrects a patent error and brings the order in conformity with the governing rule is permissible.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in reviewing its earlier order; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether form 25A was required to be furnished by a dealer who was admittedly the first seller of goods taxable under the Fifth Schedule when sales were made to registered dealers in the State.

Analysis: Rule 32(13C) requires form 25A from a purchasing dealer only where the selling dealer is not liable to tax because he is neither the first seller nor the last seller. The form is intended to enable exemption claims by intermediaries between the first and last sale. Where the assessee is the first seller and the Department can verify the purchasers through sale bills, the statutory purpose is already served and insistence on form 25A is unnecessary. The sale bills furnish the same particulars that the form would have supplied.

Conclusion: Form 25A was not required in the assessee's case; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The revision fails because the Tribunal's review order correctly applied the governing rule and the assessee was not obliged to produce form 25A on first sales to registered dealers.

Ratio Decidendi: When a statutory declaration is meant only for dealers other than the first or last seller, a first seller who sells to registered dealers may satisfy the statutory purpose through sale bills, and a review may validly correct an earlier order that is plainly inconsistent with the rule.

---