Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte revisional order was liable to be set aside for denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The petitioner had already been given several hearing dates, but the material showed that on the last date the authorised advocate was engaged before another sales tax forum and could not appear before the revisional authority in time. There was nothing on record to show that the hearing had been concluded during office hours or that the petitioner had deliberately abstained. In these circumstances, the denial of one further opportunity would be unfair, and the revisional order could not be sustained as an ex parte disposal made after a genuine difficulty in appearance.
Conclusion: The ex parte revisional order was set aside and the petitioner was granted one more opportunity of hearing.