Commercial classification of bio-fertilizer machinery depends on trade description and use, not indirect agricultural utility.

Classification of a bio-fertilizer producing machine turned on its commercial description, the nature of the buyer, and ordinary trade understanding. A machine is not agricultural machinery merely because it may have some agricultural use or its output can later be used in farming operations. On the material described, the product was treated as a composting or bio-fertilizer machine supplied to sugar factories, not machinery directly falling within the agricultural machinery entry. It was therefore classified under the residual machinery entry, with the stated tax consequence in favour of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether the machinery sold as a bio-fertilizer producing machine was agricultural machinery covered by entry 1, Part I of Schedule C of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, or machinery covered by entry 135, Part II of Schedule C.

Analysis: The decisive factors were the description of the product in the sale documents, the nature of the purchaser, and the ordinary commercial understanding of the machine. A machine that may be capable of some use in agriculture does not become agricultural machinery merely because its output can ultimately be used in agricultural operations. On the material on record, the product was treated as a composting or bio-fertilizer machine supplied to sugar factories rather than as machinery directly falling within the agricultural machinery entry.

Conclusion: The machinery did not fall under entry 1, Part I of Schedule C and was correctly classified under entry 135, Part II of Schedule C, with the tax consequence of 13 per cent, in favour of the Revenue.

---