Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the detained vehicle and goods were liable to be released immediately and how the proceedings under section 72 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were to be completed.
Analysis: Section 72 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 empowers the prescribed authority to offer composition of the alleged offence, require payment of tax and composition amount where applicable, and refuse composition by recording reasons. The petitioner had not placed a written objection or response to the show-cause notice, and therefore was not entitled to insist upon immediate release of the vehicle and goods at that stage. The authority alone was competent to consider the petitioner's response and decide whether composition should be accepted or rejected, and thereafter to pass appropriate orders under the statute.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to immediate release of the vehicle and goods without first responding to the show-cause notice, and the respondent was directed to decide the matter under section 72 after receiving the objection. If liability was determined and the amount paid, release was to follow forthwith.