Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal arising from a provisional assessment order becomes infructuous once a regular assessment order is made for the same assessment year.
Analysis: The assessment under sections 27 and 28 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 is provisional in character and operates subject to the final determination made under section 29. Section 34 reinforces this position by treating the provisional assessment as final only where no regular assessment is made within the prescribed time. The Court followed the later Division Bench view that overruled the earlier contrary single-judge decision and held that the liabilities, deposits, tax, interest, and penalty determined provisionally remain adjustable against the regular assessment. On the same reasoning, even if the appellate or revisional challenge to the provisional assessment is pending, the subsequent regular assessment governs the final tax liability for that period.
Conclusion: The appeal against the provisional assessment became infructuous on the making of the regular assessment, and the Revenue's revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A provisional assessment under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 is always subordinate to the regular assessment for the same period, and once the regular assessment is made, any pending challenge to the provisional assessment loses its independent operative force.