Trademark royalty as transfer of right to use goods held taxable under sales tax law.

Royalty received for allowing franchisees to use a trade mark was treated as consideration for a transfer of the right to use an intangible commercial asset. The Court applied the principle that "goods" can include incorporeal property capable of transfer and commercial exploitation, so the royalty arrangement fell within the sales tax net under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. On that basis, the receipts were held to constitute turnover and taxable turnover, and the revision failed as the Revenue's position was upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether royalty income received from franchisees for permitting use of the trade mark was exigible to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; (ii) Whether, on the facts, royalty receipts could be treated as involving goods, turnover and taxable turnover.

Issue (i): Whether royalty income received from franchisees for permitting use of the trade mark was exigible to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis: The decisive question was whether the transaction amounted to a transfer of the right to use an intangible commercial asset. The reasoning proceeded on the principle that the term 'goods' is of wide amplitude and can include incorporeal property capable of being transferred and commercially exploited. A trade mark licence, where the franchisee is authorised to use the mark for consideration by way of royalty, was treated as a taxable transfer of the right to use the commercial right, rather than a mere permission devoid of sales tax consequences.

Conclusion: The royalty received from franchisees was held exigible to tax, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether, on the facts, royalty receipts could be treated as involving goods, turnover and taxable turnover.

Analysis: The Court applied the settled understanding that 'goods' is not confined to tangible articles and may extend to intangible property when it is capable of transfer, use and commercial exploitation. On that basis, the royalty arrangement was treated as involving a taxable transfer of a right to use goods, so the receipts formed part of turnover and taxable turnover for sales tax purposes.

Conclusion: The royalty receipts were held to attract the concepts of goods, turnover and taxable turnover, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The revision was rejected because the royalty income from the franchise arrangements was liable to tax under the sales tax regime as consideration for transfer of the right to use a trade mark.

Ratio Decidendi: A trade mark licence for consideration can amount to a taxable transfer of the right to use intangible goods, and royalty received for such transfer forms part of turnover for sales tax purposes.

---