Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty for concealment of turnover under section 15A(1)(c) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was justified, and if so, what should be the appropriate quantum of penalty.
Analysis: Loose purchase slips seized during survey disclosed entries relating to production of deshi ghee and milk powder not reflected in the books of account, establishing specific concealment. The levy of penalty under section 15A(1)(c) was therefore upheld. On quantum, the Court noted that the case involved the first year of business, the concealment was found only for a limited period, and the Tribunal had reduced the penalty to 100 per cent without disclosing any basis. In these circumstances, the minimum penalty at 50 per cent of the concealed turnover was found to be reasonable.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 15A(1)(c) was upheld, but it was further reduced to 50 per cent of the concealed turnover.