Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessments already finalised could be reopened after the departmental circular dated 16 September 1993 and the Government Order dated 9 June 1998, in respect of additional sales tax on pulses flour.
Analysis: The dispute arose because pulses flour had been treated as taxable notwithstanding earlier departmental practice. After the High Court decision on the taxability of flour, the department issued a circular accepting that past assessments finalised up to 31 March 1993 should not be reopened, and the Government subsequently ratified that instruction. The circular and the Government Order expressly protected finalised assessments from reopening for the relevant period, and the challenge was confined to reassessment made after the circular. In that situation, reopening of completed assessments could not be sustained in law, at least so far as additional sales tax was concerned.
Conclusion: The reopening of the petitioners' completed assessments subsequent to the circular was illegal and the reassessments were set aside in respect of additional sales tax. The writ petitions were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the competent department, later ratified by the Government, accepts that finalised assessments for a past period are not to be reopened, reassessments made contrary to that administrative decision cannot be sustained.