TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns seizure & penalty orders, emphasizes reason communication for fairness</h1> <h3>BK. Enterprises Versus CTO/Central Section and others</h3> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the seizure and penalty orders unlawful due to lack of proper reasons and communication. The ... - Issues:Challenge to seizure of goods and imposition of penalty without proper reasons and communication.Analysis:The petitioner challenged the seizure of 'amsatta' and imposition of penalty without proper justification. The petitioner, a registered dealer, purchased 183 cases of 'amsatta' from Andhra Pradesh and had all necessary documents during transportation. The seizure was made without assigning any reason or communicating with the petitioner. The respondent alleged discrepancies in weight and undervaluation as grounds for seizure and penalty imposition. However, the petitioner argued that these allegations were not mentioned during the seizure and were afterthoughts. The main issue was whether the seizure and penalty orders were valid.The Tribunal found that the seizure receipt and show cause notices lacked any reasons for the actions taken by the respondent. Fresh reasons provided in the affidavit-in-opposition were not considered reliable as they were presented after the conclusion of arguments. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of communication of reasons for any order to the affected party. As the seizure was made without objective consideration and without factual reasons, it was deemed invalid. The order of penalty was also set aside, and the amount collected as penalty was directed to be refunded to the petitioner within one month.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that the seizure and penalty orders were unlawful due to the lack of proper reasons and communication. The respondent was instructed to refund the penalty amount to the petitioner. The judgment highlighted the necessity of objective consideration and communication of reasons in seizure and penalty proceedings to ensure fair procedure and justice.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
