Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisionist was entitled to exemption from trade tax under section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 on the basis of the relevant notifications, particularly in view of the requirements regarding term loan application, industrial registration and the cut-off date.
Analysis: The claim for exemption depended upon strict fulfilment of the conditions prescribed by section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 and the applicable notifications. The unit commenced production and first sale before the later notification, but the earlier notification was treated as the relevant one. On the facts found, the unit had been registered with the Industries Department, and the absence of paint in the original registration did not defeat eligibility. However, the decisive requirement was that the unit should have applied for a term loan within the stipulated time. The record showed that the company's relevant term-loan application was made after the prescribed cut-off date. In exemption matters, the burden lies on the claimant to prove strict compliance, and any failure to satisfy a mandatory condition disentitles the claimant from relief.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available because the mandatory condition relating to application for term loan was not fulfilled within time. The refusal of exemption was upheld.