TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement packed in 50 kg bags and sold to industrial/institutional consumers was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of Sl. No. 1C of the exemption notification and the effect of the second proviso to the Explanation thereto. The Tribunal applied its earlier decisions which had already interpreted the notification to mean that cement cleared in 50 kg bags to industrial/institutional consumers was eligible for the benefit, and that such goods would fall within the notification by virtue of Sl. No. 1B or 1C. As the facts were identical, the prior ratio was followed and the denial of exemption was held unsustainable.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE was available to the disputed clearances, and the demand of duty and penalty was set aside in favour of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
