Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was leviable for alleged contravention of section 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 when the goods purchased on concessional terms were used in the manufacture of books.
Analysis: Section 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies only where goods purchased for the purposes covered by section 8(3)(b), 8(3)(c) or 8(3)(d) are not used for such purpose without reasonable excuse. The registered dealer had purchased paper against form C for use in manufacturing books, and the paper was in fact used for that very manufacturing activity. The goods were not diverted to any other purpose falling outside the permitted use. On these facts, the statutory condition for penalty was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The levy of penalty was not sustainable and the deletion of penalty was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The revisions failed because no contravention attracting penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was established.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under section 10(d) arises only when goods purchased for the specified statutory purpose are not used for that purpose; actual use of the goods in the authorised manufacturing activity negatives the contravention.