Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight paid for coal transported from outside Uttar Pradesh to within the State, in circumstances where railway receipts stood in the dealer's name and endorsement in favour of the purchasers was not shown, formed part of the dealer's turnover under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The coal was imported through railway against declaration form XXXI and the railway receipts were in the name of the dealer. There was no proof that the railway receipts had been endorsed in favour of the purchasers or that delivery was taken by them after such endorsement. Even if the freight had been paid directly by the brick kiln owners, the liability to pay freight remained that of the dealer, and such payment was treated as having been made on behalf of the dealer. Freight incurred for transporting goods from outside the State to inside the State was inward freight paid before the sale and was therefore attributable to the turnover.
Conclusion: Freight formed part of the dealer's turnover and was liable to tax under the Act.