Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether concessional rate of tax could be granted on the basis of form C produced as additional evidence in appeal without giving the assessing authority an opportunity to rebut it.
Analysis: Section 12B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 permits additional evidence on appeal or revision only when statutory conditions are met and, once such evidence is taken on record, reasonable opportunity of challenge or rebuttal must be given to the assessing authority. The first appellate authority admitted form C as additional evidence but did not afford any rebuttal opportunity to the assessing officer. The view that the absence of an objection by the State Representative cured this defect was rejected, because compliance with the statutory mandate under section 12B is obligatory and cannot depend on whether the issue was separately pressed by the departmental representative.
Conclusion: Concessional tax benefit on the basis of form C could not be sustained without giving the assessing authority an opportunity of rebuttal, and the appellate orders were illegal.
Final Conclusion: The matter required fresh consideration by the first appellate authority after complying with the mandatory rebuttal requirement under section 12B, and the revisions succeeded.