Amalgamation and sales tax: post-effective-date inter-company transfers are not sales, but refund remains subject to anti-pass-through rules.

An amalgamation given effect from a specified date treats the transferor and transferee as one corporate entity from that date, so post-effective-date inter-company stock movements are not taxable sales under the Central Sales Tax Act. Refund of tax wrongly collected is not automatic: the dealer must satisfy the statutory anti-pass-through condition and show the burden was not passed on, reflecting the unjust enrichment principle. Refund may also be withheld where a refund order is under challenge or related proceedings are pending, subject to the statutory approval mechanism. The note concludes that while the inter-company transactions escaped sales tax, refund remained controlled by statutory conditions and could not be claimed as of right.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether, on the effective date of amalgamation, transactions between the transferor and transferee companies could still be treated as taxable sales under the Central Sales Tax Act; (ii) whether refund of tax found to have been wrongly collected was automatic or subject to the statutory condition that the tax had not been passed on; (iii) whether refund could be withheld under the State sales tax law when the refund-granting order was the subject of further proceedings.

Issue (i): whether, on the effective date of amalgamation, transactions between the transferor and transferee companies could still be treated as taxable sales under the Central Sales Tax Act.

Analysis: The amalgamation took effect from the date fixed in the scheme, and the legal consequence of such amalgamation was that the transferor company ceased to exist in law from that date. The Court applied the doctrine that a statutory or court-sanctioned legal fiction must be carried to its logical end. On that basis, transactions entered into between the amalgamating entities after the effective date were not sales between two independent legal persons but only movement of stock within the same corporate entity.

Conclusion: The transactions were not taxable sales and the tax revision was not sustainable.

Issue (ii): whether refund of tax found to have been wrongly collected was automatic or subject to the statutory condition that the tax had not been passed on.

Analysis: The refund provisions applicable through the Central Sales Tax Act incorporated the State law restrictions on refund. A refund is not an automatic consequence of a judicial finding that tax was collected without authority. The dealer seeking refund must satisfy the assessing authority that the tax burden was not passed on to the purchaser. The principle against unjust enrichment governs such claims.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to a mandamus for immediate refund without satisfying the statutory condition.

Issue (iii): whether refund could be withheld under the State sales tax law when the refund-granting order was the subject of further proceedings.

Analysis: The provision empowering withholding of refund requires approval of the superior authority before refund is withheld in cases where the refund order is under challenge or another proceeding is pending. The Court held that the superior authority's role is central to the decision and that the absence of an originating proposal from the assessing authority did not invalidate the withholding order in the circumstances considered.

Conclusion: The withholding of refund was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The Court held that the inter-company transactions after the effective date of amalgamation were not liable to sales tax, but the assessee was not entitled to refund as of right and had to pursue refund in accordance with the statutory conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an amalgamation is given effect from a specified date, the amalgamating entities are to be treated as one from that date for fiscal purposes, but refund of indirectly collected tax remains subject to the anti-pass-through condition and the statutory refund controls.

---