Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 61(2)(e) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, as amended, was ultra vires on the ground that DEPB receipts were not goods and whether tax could validly be levied on their sale or transfer.
Analysis: The impugned provision imposed tax on the turnover arising from sale or purchase of Duty Entitlement Pass Book transactions and reduced the applicable rate for past transactions. The challenge was founded on the plea that DEPB represented only a right to credit and not goods within the meaning of the sales tax law, and that the State Legislature lacked competence under Entry 54 of List II. The Court noted that earlier authorities had treated similar transferable import licences and scrips as goods and had upheld levy of sales tax. It further relied on the Constitution Bench decision in Sunrise Associates, which had not decided the taxability of REP licences or DEPB, but had overruled the earlier contrary line only prospectively, leaving the earlier binding position intact until the date of that judgment. On that basis, the Court held that the challenge to the levy could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Section 61(2)(e) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was upheld as valid, and the assessment levying tax on DEPB transactions was sustained.