Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel springs sold by the assessee were classifiable under entry 99/68 of the First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, or under entry 2(ii)(d) or entry 2(ii)(f) of the Second Schedule.
Analysis: Steel springs were described as a distinct commodity manufactured by twisting steel wire spirally and giving hooked ends, resulting in a commercially different article. The Second Schedule entries relied on by the assessee specifically covered steel bars, sheets, hoops, strips and skelp, but did not include steel springs. Entry 99/68 of the First Schedule covered iron and steel articles not mentioned elsewhere in the Schedules. On that construction, steel springs fell within the First Schedule and not within the Second Schedule entries invoked by the assessee.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the assessing authority and the appellate authority was correct, and steel springs were liable to be taxed under entry 99/68 of the First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Final Conclusion: The tax revision cases were allowed and the Tribunal's order was set aside, with the questions answered in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a commodity is not specifically mentioned in the more specific schedule entries and is covered by a residuary-style entry for articles not mentioned elsewhere, it must be classified under that entry rather than by analogy to listed items.