Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mosquito repellents were exigible to tax under entry 78 of the First Schedule as insecticides or pesticides, or whether they were liable to be treated as general goods, and whether the revisional orders could stand for the period prior to 1 January 2000.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the proper classification of mosquito repellents under the sales tax schedule. The earlier tribunal decision treated the commodity as falling within the insecticide/pesticide entry, and the court noted that there was no separate entry for mosquito repellents in the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 during the relevant period. A later specific entry was introduced only with effect from 1 January 2000 as entry 203, showing that the commodity had been separately carved out only from that date. On that basis, the revisional orders could not survive to the extent they treated the goods differently for the earlier period.
Conclusion: Mosquito repellents were to be treated as insecticides up to 1 January 2000, and the revisional orders were set aside to that extent in favour of the assessee.