Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product marketed as Jet mat was a mosquito repellent taxable under entry 129 of Schedule II, Part A of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, or an insecticide entitled to partial exemption.
Analysis: The product was described and marketed as a mosquito repellent mat containing d-Allethrin 4 per cent. The presence of an ingredient that may have insecticidal properties did not alter the commercial identity of the product. Once the Legislature created a specific taxable entry for mosquito repellents, the product had to be classified according to its true commercial character rather than by one constituent ingredient or by reference to exemption provisions dealing generally with pesticides or insecticides. Decisions under different sales tax statutes and different entry structures were held not to govern the construction of the Gujarat Act.
Conclusion: The product fell within entry 129 as a mosquito repellent and was not entitled to the claimed exemption.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the tax classification failed, and the levy under the specific entry was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a product is commercially and statutorily identifiable under a specific taxable entry, it must be classified under that entry notwithstanding that one of its ingredients may also have another technical or incidental character.