Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether registration under section 8A(1B) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could be cancelled immediately for failure to furnish additional security, or whether the authority had to wait for expiry of the three-month period applicable to tax, penalty or other dues.
Analysis: Section 8A(1B) permits cancellation of a registration not only where tax, penalty or other dues remain unpaid for three months, but also where there is any other sufficient reason. Additional security demanded under section 8C does not fall within the expression tax, penalty or other dues. If the dealer failed to furnish the additional security within the time fixed by the assessing authority, that default could constitute sufficient reason for cancellation of registration, and the three-month period was not attracted.
Conclusion: The view that cancellation could be made only after expiry of three months was incorrect. The cancellation was legally sustainable on the ground of non-furnishing of additional security, and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a registration provision authorises cancellation for any other sufficient reason, default in furnishing additional security within the time fixed by the authority may itself justify cancellation, and a statutory period tied only to unpaid tax, penalty or other dues does not apply.