Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether writ petitions challenging assessment orders raising disputed questions of fact were maintainable in view of the statutory appellate remedy.
Analysis: The assessment disputes concerned the nature of royalty paid for minerals, the applicability of purchase tax, the levy of differential tax on export-related turnover, and inclusion of packing and forwarding charges in taxable turnover. These were factual and mixed questions that could be examined by the appellate authority under the sales tax statute. The assessment orders were passed by an authority competent to do so, and the statute provided a complete machinery of appeal and further appeal. The extraordinary writ remedy was therefore not appropriate for bypassing the appellate forum.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were not maintainable and had to be pursued, if at all, in the statutory appellate forum.
Final Conclusion: The Court declined to interfere with the assessment orders and left the petitioner to work out the remedy of appeal under the statute.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment order is within the authority's jurisdiction and the controversy turns on disputed factual issues, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked when an efficacious statutory appeal is available.