TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment order under the value added tax could be sustained when it merely rejected the dealer's explanation in a cryptic manner without recording reasons.
Analysis: The writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was invoked against an assessment order passed under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The assessment order did not deal with the dealer's explanation on classification and taxation, but merely stated that the reply was not accepted. Such an order failed to disclose the basis of the decision and did not show any application of mind to the explanation submitted. An assessing authority is required to consider the explanation and, where it is rejected, to record reasons so that the decision is transparent, bona fide, and capable of judicial scrutiny.
Conclusion: The cryptic assessment order was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered by passing a speaking and reasoned order after considering the explanation.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order that rejects a taxpayer's explanation without reasons is a non-speaking order liable to be interfered with in writ jurisdiction, and the authority must pass a reasoned order after considering the reply.
TaxTMI 
