Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be levied and recovered on arrears of central sales tax for the assessment year 1998-99 in light of the amended provisions of section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The recovery proceedings were initiated under section 13(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 for arrears of central sales tax along with interest. The Court noted that section 9(2B) inserted by the Finance Act, 2000 expressly made a dealer liable to pay interest for delayed payment of tax under the Central Sales Tax Act and enabled application of the State law provisions for due date, rate of interest, assessment and collection. The accompanying amendments in section 9(2) were treated as giving retrospective effect to the recovery of interest and as validating earlier proceedings, acts and orders relating to such interest. The earlier Supreme Court decision holding that no interest could be levied in the absence of a substantive provision was distinguished because it predated the amendment, and the decision on retrospectivity in taxing provisions was found inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: Interest on the arrears of central sales tax was recoverable under the amended provisions, and the objection to levy of interest was rejected.