Packing material follows exempt goods for tax purposes, while reused cloth and distinct husk commodities were treated separately.

Packing material was treated as not independently taxable where, on the facts and the statutory scheme, it followed the tax character of the exempt goods packed in it. Used filter cloth and polypropylene cloth, found to be reusable discarded material, were not brought to tax. Pouching charges for pouches used with exempt country liquor were deleted, the packing-material provision being read as clarificatory and applicable to the facts. Gunny bags used only for exempt sugar were also held not taxable. Rice husk and paddy husk were recognised as distinct commodities for tax purposes, with the factual finding on the goods' nature given controlling weight.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether tax was payable on sale of used filter cloth and polypropylene cloth treated as old, discarded or unserviceable material under the relevant notification; (ii) whether pouching charges on pouches used for exempt country liquor were taxable under the definition clause and packing material provision; (iii) whether sale of gunny bags used for packing exempt sugar was taxable; and (iv) whether rice husk and paddy husk were separate commodities for the purpose of taxability.

Issue (i): Whether tax was payable on sale of used filter cloth and polypropylene cloth treated as old, discarded or unserviceable material under the relevant notification.

Analysis: The cloth was found to have been used as filter material in the manufacturing process and, on the evidence, was capable of being reused after sale. The departmental case that it fell within the notified category of old or discarded machinery was not supported by contrary material. The question was largely factual and depended on appreciation of evidence.

Conclusion: The sale of used filter cloth and polypropylene cloth was not liable to tax, and the finding of the Tribunal was upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether pouching charges on pouches used for exempt country liquor were taxable under the definition clause and packing material provision.

Analysis: The pouches were manufactured from poly-film sheets and sold as containers for country liquor, which was itself exempt. The circular of the trade tax authorities, read with the statutory scheme, supported the view that packing material could not be taxed independently in the facts of the case. The provision relating to packing material was treated as clarificatory and applicable retrospectively.

Conclusion: The levy on pouching charges was correctly deleted, and the Tribunal's view was sustained.

Issue (iii): Whether sale of gunny bags used for packing exempt sugar was taxable.

Analysis: Sugar was exempt, and the gunny bags were used only as packing material for that exempt commodity. In the absence of any separate price charged for the bags and in light of the settled view that packing material follows the tax treatment of the packed goods, the bags could not be brought to tax.

Conclusion: The sale of gunny bags was not taxable.

Issue (iv): Whether rice husk and paddy husk were separate commodities for the purpose of taxability.

Analysis: The commodity purchased by the dealer was treated by the assessing authority, on the facts, as rice husk and not paddy husk, and tax was levied at the point of first purchase. The Tribunal's contrary approach could not override the factual finding unless that finding was displaced on proper grounds. The legal position accepted by the Court was that rice husk and paddy husk are distinct commodities.

Conclusion: Rice husk and paddy husk are different commodities, and the Tribunal was justified in so holding.

Final Conclusion: The revision failed on all material questions decided, and the Tribunal's order deleting the disputed tax liability was sustained in full.

Ratio Decidendi: Packing material is not independently taxable where, on the facts and the applicable statutory scheme, it follows the exempt character of the goods packed in it, and factual findings on the nature and reuse of goods will not be disturbed absent contrary material.

---