Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether form XXVIIIB could be withheld under rule 45(b) of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules in the absence of a prior determination of tax liability and an unpaid demand.
Analysis: The entitlement to withhold form XXVIIIB depended on the existence of one of the contingencies specified in rule 45(b), namely, default in filing returns with payment of admitted tax, or failure to pay tax demanded under section 25(2) of the Act within the prescribed or extended time. On the facts, no determination had been made by the sales tax authorities that tax was payable on the sockets, and no unpaid demand against the petitioner had been established. The petitioner had been filing returns and paying tax according to those returns. In those circumstances, the statutory basis for stopping issuance of the form was absent.
Conclusion: The withholding of form XXVIIIB was unjustified and the impugned orders were liable to be quashed, with a direction to issue the form to the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: Relief was granted to the petitioner, while the question of liability to pay sales tax on sockets was left open for determination by the competent authorities in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory form cannot be withheld under rule 45(b) unless the specific statutory contingencies for default or non-payment after a valid tax determination are first satisfied.