Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice issued by the assessing authority under section 16(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, to bring to tax escaped turnover was valid when the assessee objected to the authority initiating action.
Analysis: Section 16(1)(a), and also section 16(1)(b), empower the assessing authority to proceed in matters relating to escaped turnover. The assessee has no vested right to insist that action must be taken by a different wing or by a particular officer. The legality of the notice depends on the competence of the authority issuing it, and not on the assessee's preference as to who should act. Since the impugned notice was issued by the assessing authority referred to in section 16(1)(a), it was within jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The notice was held to be valid and the challenge to it failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice for escaped turnover issued by the assessing authority under section 16(1)(a) is valid where the statute confers that power on the assessing authority, and the assessee has no vested right to require action by a different authority.