Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether leco fine is a form of coke and therefore a declared commodity under item 2(i) of the Second Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Analysis: Item 2(i) covers coal including coke in all its forms but excludes charcoal. There was no separate entry for lignite or leco fine in the Kerala Schedule, unlike the Gujarat statute considered in the cited decision. The material before the Court showed that leco fine was made from lignite obtained from coal fields, and the Court found support in the Karnataka and Madras decisions treating leco or lignite-based material as falling within coal in its different forms. On that basis, the Court concluded that the commodity answered the description of coke in one of its forms.
Conclusion: Leco fine is a form of coke and a declared commodity exigible to tax at four per cent, and the contrary view taken under section 35 was held unsustainable.