Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 when the assessee had filed a revised return before issuance of the pre-assessment notice and before final assessment.
Analysis: The revised return was filed before the pre-assessment notice, and the assessment was completed on the basis of that return. On these facts, the levy of penalty under section 12(3) was held to be unwarranted. The same reasoning also applied to the reduction of penalty by the appellate authority and to the Tribunal's consideration of penalty under section 12(5).
Conclusion: The penalty could not be sustained, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under the sales tax provisions is not sustainable where the dealer files a revised return before pre-assessment notice and the assessment is made on that return, absent the conditions justifying such penalty.