Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty was exigible for non-disclosure of taxable turnover in the monthly return where the assessee filed a revised statement before completion of assessment and claimed bona fide reasons for the omission.
Analysis: The assessee had not disclosed the taxable turnover in the monthly return, which ordinarily attracted penalty under section 9(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with section 12(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. However, the turnover was subsequently disclosed by a statement filed before completion of the assessment. The explanation accepted by the Tribunal showed that the omission arose from uncertainty regarding the true nature of the transaction and was not a deliberate suppression. In those circumstances, and in view of the filing of the revised statement before assessment was finalised, the statutory basis for imposing penalty was not made out.
Conclusion: Penalty was not exigible and the deletion of penalty was .
Final Conclusion: The revision failed, and the cancellation of penalty was left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee files a revised disclosure before completion of assessment and the omission to disclose turnover is found to be bona fide, penalty for non-disclosure is not exigible.