Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to have the belated C form declarations accepted for the inter-State sale of leather meal for the assessment year 1994-95.
Analysis: The entitlement to furnish C form declarations on the merits of the transaction was not in dispute. The rejection rested only on delay in filing the forms. The petitioner had approached the authority under section 55 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 read with sections 8(4) and 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the respondent had the power to accept the declarations even after the assessment order. In these circumstances, a request that was otherwise valid on merits could not be refused merely on a technical ground of belated production, especially where the explanation was that the forms had not been obtained from the dealers in time.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to acceptance of the C form declarations, and the rejection on the ground of delay was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where entitlement to tax-declaration forms is able on merits and the assessing authority has power to accept them even after assessment, belated filing alone is not a valid ground to reject the request when substantial justice requires acceptance.