Essential character controls sales tax classification, and trade discounts remain deductible when allowed under normal commercial practice.

For sales tax classification, the essential character of the goods governed their entry: a product made as poultry-feed with only a small medicinal ingredient was classifiable as poultry-feed, not as drug and medicine, and the assessee's classification was accepted. Target discounts allowed under normal trade practice were deductible from turnover even when granted at year-end on final settlement of accounts, and the disallowance was held unjustified. The appellate authority's order was restored in full in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the product "Aurofac" was classifiable as poultry-feed under item 80 of the First Schedule to the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 or as drug and medicine under item 37 of that Schedule; (ii) Whether target discounts allowed to customers were deductible from turnover.

Issue (i): Whether the product "Aurofac" was classifiable as poultry-feed under item 80 of the First Schedule to the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 or as drug and medicine under item 37 of that Schedule.

Analysis: The product was found to be poultry-feed prepared with feed ingredients, though it contained a small percentage of medicinal substance. Its essential character was that of poultry-feed, and the proper classification was to be made on that basis rather than on the mere presence of some medicinal value. The earlier appellate finding treating the product as poultry-feed was accepted.

Conclusion: The product was held to be poultry-feed and taxable under item 80 of the First Schedule, not under item 37.

Issue (ii): Whether target discounts allowed to customers were deductible from turnover.

Analysis: Discounts granted according to trade practice, even if allowed at the end of the year when accounts were settled, were treated as permissible deductions from turnover. The definition of turnover and the relevant rule did not justify disallowance where the discount formed part of the commercial arrangement and was actually allowed.

Conclusion: The target discounts were held to be deductible and the disallowance was unjustified.

Final Conclusion: The appellate authority's order was restored in full, with both the classification and deduction issues decided in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: For sales tax classification, the essential character of the goods governs their entry, and discounts allowed in accordance with normal trade practice are deductible from turnover even if given at the time of final settlement of accounts.

---