Common parlance classification of isabgul husk denied cereal exemption; drugs-and-medicines entry requires fresh determination.

Husk of isabgul was held not to be husk of cereals, because classification must follow the ordinary and common parlance meaning of the commodity, supported by scientific and dictionary material. On that reasoning, the exemption for husk and bran of cereals and pulses did not apply. The classification issue on whether husk of isabgul fell under the drugs and medicines entry was left undecided, because the authority had not given a clear finding on that specific entry. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh determination of the applicable tax rate under the relevant schedule entry.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether husk of isabgul is husk of cereals within Serial No. 14(b)(ii) of Schedule I to the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 and therefore exempt from tax. (ii) Whether the authority was required to decide whether husk of isabgul falls under Serial No. 24 of Part A to Schedule IV of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 as drugs or medicines, or whether it should otherwise be classified under the general entry.

Issue (i): Whether husk of isabgul is husk of cereals within Serial No. 14(b)(ii) of Schedule I to the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 and therefore exempt from tax.

Analysis: The expression covered husk and bran of cereals and pulses sold without sealed containers or polythene packets. The authority below examined the commodity with reference to scientific material, dictionary meaning, and common parlance. On that basis, it held that isabgul is not a cereal, is not used as foodgrain in the ordinary sense, and does not answer the common understanding of cereals. The Tribunal accepted that reasoning and found no basis to treat husk of isabgul as husk of cereals.

Conclusion: The answer is in the negative. Husk of isabgul is not husk of cereals and does not qualify for exemption under Serial No. 14(b)(ii) of Schedule I.

Issue (ii): Whether the authority was required to decide whether husk of isabgul falls under Serial No. 24 of Part A to Schedule IV of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 as drugs or medicines, or whether it should otherwise be classified under the general entry.

Analysis: The impugned order proceeded on the footing that isabgul was used as a mild laxative, but it did not return a clear finding on whether the commodity fell within the drugs and medicines entry. Since classification directly affected the applicable rate of tax, the authority was required to decide that question on merits after hearing the assessee. The omission meant the issue remained unanswered and needed fresh adjudication.

Conclusion: The issue was remitted for fresh decision. The authority was directed to determine whether the sale of husk of isabgul attracts tax at 10 per cent or at a lower rate under the relevant entry.

Final Conclusion: The classification of husk of isabgul as non-cereal was upheld, but the matter was sent back for fresh determination on whether it falls within the drugs and medicines entry and the consequent rate of tax.

Ratio Decidendi: Classification of taxable goods must be determined according to their ordinary/common parlance understanding, and where the assessing authority fails to decide the specific entry that governs the rate of tax, the matter may be remitted for fresh consideration.

---