Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of tendu leaves under the Madhya Pradesh statutory monopoly scheme was an inter-State sale or an intra-State sale for the purpose of sales tax.
Analysis: The scheme under the M.P. Tendu Patta (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1964 created a State monopoly in the trade of tendu leaves, regulated appointment of agents, registration of manufacturers, restrictions on purchase and transport, and controlled disposal and resale of the produce. The contention that the purchasers bought the leaves for manufacture outside Madhya Pradesh did not, by itself, make the sale inter-State. The decisive test was whether the sale itself occasioned the movement of goods from one State to another. On the facts, the statutory sale was completed within Madhya Pradesh and the possibility of later movement pursuant to the purchaser's own choice did not convert it into an inter-State sale. The earlier decision relied upon by the petitioners was distinguished because there the contractual terms themselves required delivery for onward movement outside the State.
Conclusion: The sale of tendu leaves was an intra-State sale exigible to tax under the State law and not an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory monopoly sale is completed within the State and the movement of goods outside the State is not occasioned by the sale itself, the transaction is an intra-State sale for sales tax purposes.