Photographic processing as a contract of service: incidental use of materials does not create a taxable works contract.

Developing negatives, making positive prints and supplying them to customers in a photo lab was treated as a contract of service, not a works contract. The decisive test was whether the dominant intention was the transfer of goods as goods or the rendering of photographic skill and labour; incidental use of paper and other materials did not convert the transaction into a sale. Applying Supreme Court authority on photographic work and photocopying, the court rejected attempts to distinguish between kinds of photo-lab activity and held that sales tax could not be levied as a deemed sale in execution of a works contract.

---

---

Issues: Whether the activity of developing negatives, making positive prints, and supplying them to customers in a photo lab amounts to a works contract liable to sales tax, or is merely a contract of service and work and labour.

Analysis: The operative test applied was whether the dominant intention of the transaction was the sale or deemed sale of goods, or whether the transfer of paper and other materials was merely incidental to the rendering of photographic service. The Court followed the principle that mere passing of property in materials used in the course of a service does not convert the transaction into a sale. It held that the Supreme Court authorities on photographic work and photocopying established that such activity is essentially one of skill and labour, and that the incidental use of paper does not by itself create a works contract. The Court also held that the distinction sought to be drawn between different kinds of photo-lab activities was not supported by the binding precedent relied upon.

Conclusion: The activity was held to be a contract of service and not a works contract. Tax could not be levied on the transaction as a sale of goods involved in execution of works contract, and the assessee succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the main object of a photographic or photocopying transaction is to obtain a service result and not the transfer of goods as goods, any use of paper or other materials is merely incidental and does not attract sales tax as a works contract.

---